Mistakes to avoid as a project leader

Distributed Teams Leadership Mistakes Project Managers Make

By Nionila Ivanova

Managing distributed teams brings much valuable experience. As a project manager and CEO leading a remote team, I’ve learnt which mistakes to avoid. In this article, I’ll share some common leadership mistakes project managers make working remotely, and solutions on how to handle them.

#1 Ineffective Communication

Let’s start with the first and most common problem. It’s communication.

As you will know, communication is the most important soft skill for a project manager as a leader. Meanwhile, when managing a distributed team, many PMs surprisingly lose this skill or use it inconsistently. From my experience, this mistake often begins with the absence of clear communication rules.

Remote teams need more structure. When communication channels aren’t clearly defined by a project manager at the start, people get confused. They aren’t sure where to ask questions or where important decisions should be documented.

For example, project managers often don’t explain when the team should use email tracking tools versus other communication channels, finding the source of truth becomes challenging. Instead of working on the tasks, the team members intuitively try to resolve communication problems on their own.

Communication issues also appear in the number of meetings. Both extremes are harmful. When there are too few meetings, many problems are difficult to solve in writing. Complex topics often require live discussion and regular updates help the team stay aligned.

On the other hand, too many calls can be just as damaging. I’ve seen teams become irritated when leaders schedule calls for simple questions that could be resolved with a short message in a few minutes.

I suggest the following tips to avoid communication mistakes in a distributed team:

  1. The first step is to standardize how communication works. Because the team should clearly understand which tools are used and for what purpose.
  2. Being direct and open in communication also matters. Remote teams cannot read body language, so it’s better to say what you need from the team than to assume they will figure it out on their own.
  3. Limit the number of communication channels. Using too many tools creates noise and splits attention. For example, choose one main channel for daily communication and group discussions by topic.
  4. Meetings also require structure. As a project manager, it’s important to explain what topics will be discussed and what input you expect from the team.

#2 Micro-management

mistakes in project leadership

In project management, micro-management is also quite common, especially in remote teams. In my view, micro-management is closely connected to a lack of trust. Trust plays a critical role in remote work, yet many leaders struggle with it when they cannot see what the team is doing every day or even an hour.

Overcontrol is a serious leadership mistake. It creates the illusion that you are fully involved and trying to help, but in reality this help is often false. Constant check ins, unexpected calls, or frequent questions about what someone is working on rarely support the team.

To avoid micro-management, PMs should develop a mutual respect based on personal time and boundary consideration. In distributed teams, people often work in different time zones and follow different schedules. Someone may be taking a break or focusing deeply on a task. Messages like “What are you working on right now?” usually create frustration rather than clarity.

A more effective approach is to focus on results instead of constant monitoring. Regular daily or weekly calls already provide enough visibility into the work being done.

#3 Avoiding to provide feedback

If feedback is often missing even in office based teams, it becomes also a more common issue in distributed teams. Regular feedback from a leader helps specialists understand their performance and see their progress on tasks. When ignoring this, the team may feel unsure about their value and direction, even if they are doing a job well.

Project managers need to be more attentive and intentional when working remotely. Feedback doesn’t always have to be formal. It can be shared during regular calls, short messages, or simple progress updates on tasks.

What matters is consistency and clarity. Team members should understand what was done well and what can be improved next time.

#4 Ignoring Time Zone Differences

time zone differences

Distributed teams usually bring together people from different parts of the world. It’s almost impossible for such teams to work within the same time zone. Ignoring time zone differences by a project manager leads to many other problems with communication, meetings, or deadlines.

Speaking of solutions, for project managers it’s important to be especially careful when planning work like scheduling meetings without considering local working hours or setting deadlines that don’t reflect real availability.

Additionally, special time zone management tools can be very helpful in this case. Keeping track of everyone’s availability manually is unrealistic, especially as teams grow. These tools make it easier to coordinate meetings and plan deadlines.

Another important practice is defining overlap hours. Even if the team works across different time zones, having a small shared time window helps maintain alignment. This time can be used for critical discussions or quick syncs, while the rest of the work remains asynchronous.

In Conclusion

In this article, I’ve covered only some of the most common leadership mistakes project managers make when working with distributed teams. These are not the only challenges, but they appear often and have a direct impact on team performance and motivation.


About the Author – Nionila Ivanova

As the CEO of IT Creative Labs and creator of IT Project Management Training for women, Nionila exemplifies the challenges faced by women entrepreneurs in the tech industry. Nionila has 15+ years of experience managing tech teams and leading projects with Agile and Waterfall methodologies. PMP Certified and a Certified Scrum Master. Tech Entrepreneur with an MBA in Computer Information Systems.

Book Review: The Conscious Project Leader

By Linky van der Merwe

The Conscious Project LeaderWhen I was contacted by Colin Ellis to do a review of his new book: “The Conscious Project Leader”, I was curious to find out what new can be said about this well covered topic?  I was pleasantly surprised!

Colin has a fresh perspective on project management, resulting in a book that you cannot put down once you start reading it. His wisdom comes from two decades of experience (in the coal face, as he calls it) and from doing projects on three different continents, Britain, New Zealand and Australia. Colin is also a speaker, writer and mentor on Conscious Project Leadership. One of his outstanding qualities, seems to be his sense of humour.

Leadership and Culture

The book is written from the perspective of how to create a culture of success for your projects, your team and yourself. Although leadership is covered in detail, much focus is also given to culture; like hiring, having a vision, collaboration, stakeholder satisfaction and celebrating success.

He covers just enough technical project management to make the book complete and without any unnecessary jargon that may confuse a reader. It is written in an informal style that is very engaging.

The chapters are short and to the point. There are numerous references to other books to read, videos to watch and actions to take, putting the reader on a journey of self-discovery and development towards becoming a conscious leader.

Lift Project Performance

What I compassionately agree with Colin, is that projects can change the world and that it’s frustrating that a big percentage of projects continue to fail. This book is his contribution to improve project success by helping professionals to be great project leaders and to give them the knowledge to be consistently successful. Another point we agree on is that we believe project success stories make the best lessons to learn.

Colin argues that projects are about people and that perhaps too much emphasis is placed on methods and processes and not enough on developing leaders who are responsible and accountable for project delivery.

Although I don’t disagree with that, I believe that developing leadership skills is equally important to having the right foundation of using methods and processes consistently. Training approaches should put equal weighting on both hard, as well as soft skills.

Conscious Leadership

Once you finish reading, Colin reminds you that this is just the beginning of your journey towards Conscious Project Leadership and that you have a big responsibility to apply your knowledge and to create the culture that will contribute to success. He challenges his fellow project practitioners to help make our profession proud.

Recommendation

Compared to other Project Leadership books that I have reviewed before, like “Leadership Toolbox for Project Managers by Michel Dion and The Power of Project Leadership by Susanne Madsen, I think this book complements what is already written.

It is modern in the sense that you can read it on a mobile device and visit the links at the end of chapters immediately. Colin has also prepared relevant quotes that he encourages the reader to share with their social networks using #CPL. It may start a movement under professionals who are committed to change.

I can recommend this book to all project practitioners, PMO managers/directors and people who have the opportunity to coach and mentor new and inexperienced project leaders.

You will find this book on Amazon and on Colin’s website, The Conscious Project Leader.

 

Leadership and the Project Manager – What Leadership Role to Adopt?

Source: The Project Manager, Author Louise Worsley

This article is about the important aspect of leadership and what type of leadership role the project manager should adopt.

In projects, the leadership role of the project manager must be focused on ‘action’ leadership while the sponsor must take the ‘visionary’ and political leadership positions for the project to have any chance of success.  This will be explained by looking at the Pentagon model of project leadership.

Pentagon model of project leadership

The pentagon model of project leadership suggests five distinct leadership roles.  These do not operate in isolation, but are necessary elements contributing to the leadership of change. Individuals may take on several of these leadership roles, or more than one person may contribute to one area. However, an absence or failure of leadership in any one of these key areas will put at risk the entire project or programme.
Leadership and the Project Manager

 

Ethics and the personal responsibilities of the project manager

The professional bodies in project management all have a code of ethics for project managers.  The PMI’s code of ethics is summed up as:

As practitioners of project management, we are committed to doing what is right and honorable. We set high standards for ourselves and we aspire to meet these standards in all aspects of our lives—at work, at home, and in service to our profession.

The Association for Project Management identify that project managers have personal responsibilities that go “beyond those immediately implied by their contract with employers or clients”.  This is expanded upon further and two statements are particularly relevant to this discussion.  The project manager should:

  • act in the best interests of their employer and clients in all business and professional matters,  having regard to wider public interest concerns and those of any employer or colleague;
  • declare and appropriately manage all matters which are, or could be construed as, a conflict of interests.

On complex projects, project managers are inevitably faced with conflicts of interest.  The most important personal attributes for successful project managers relate to having the integrity (and in some cases bravery) to expose these concerns, and the tenacity to engage as vigorously as required with all stakeholders to seek out the best possible solutions. Managing conflict, in the sense of identifying and finding negotiated solutions to often complex competing stakeholder agendas, is part of the day-job for project managers involved in politically sensitive projects.

Louise Worsley is Director of PiCubed and lectures on the UCT executive development programme.  You may contact her at: info@pi3.co.za

Please share your thoughts about Leadership and Project Managers in the comments section below.